Evidence & Impact
Measure what happened. Learn from what did not.
RE:GEN uses pilot evidence to improve the operating model — without turning attendance into unsupported impact claims.
Good evidence is not only about collecting more data. It is about making the right claim for the level of evidence available.
Pilot Snapshot
Two early public activations created a usable evidence base.
Paradigm Mall and Hextar World Mall provided the first controlled public-space tests of the experience.
2
public pilots within 10 days
130
participant records
15 → 24 min
inside dwell-time change
100+
early digital registrations
Impact Logic
Output does not automatically equal impact.
Each level supports a different type of claim.
Input
Funding, people, venue, technology, materials and partners.
Activity
Exhibitions, planting, workshops, volunteering and learning.
Output
Participants, hours, kilograms, interactions and digital records.
Outcome
Knowledge, perception, intention, repeat participation or stronger connection where appropriately measured.
Long-term Impact
Sustained behaviour, stewardship, environmental improvement or durable community capacity where longitudinal evidence exists.
External Case Discussion
RE:GEN featured on Nikkei BizRuptors.
The teaching case puts the scaling dilemma under scrutiny rather than presenting RE:GEN as a finished success story.
It asks what governance, safeguarding, privacy and evidence controls are needed as corporate, community and digital pathways expand.
TEACHING CASE
Scale without weakening trust.
Corporate sponsorship can accelerate reach. Community-led growth can protect mission. Digital scaling can create continuity — but each pathway introduces different risks.